![]() ![]() CNN’s Haley Britzky and Natasha Bertrand write that “Army officials are increasingly concerned that without new funding, they will have to begin pulling money from other critical projects to continue supporting Kyiv,” as the Army’s Europe and Africa Command “has roughly $3 billion to pay for $5 billion of operations costs.” The lack of movement by the House is already being felt intensely by the U.S. Throughout the security conference, the pair reports, “awmakers from both parties in Munich assured ally after ally that the House would eventually greenlight the aid, with some predicting passage as soon as March.” will be able to actually make good on its promises to keep providing assistance to Ukraine given the ongoing challenges within the House Republican Conference.Īnd the answer is just as uncertain as it was before Munich, if not more. ![]() With Munich now over and world leaders heading back home, the biggest question on their minds is whether the U.S. “Four American senators recounted a story Ukrainian officials told them at the Munich Security Conference: A soldier in a muddy trench with Russian artillery exploding nearby, scrolling on his phone for signs the U.S. THE POST-MUNICH OUTLOOK - If ever there was a paragraph that captured the state of play in Ukraine, it’s this one from a Munich Security Conference dispatch by our colleagues Alex Ward and Paul McCleary: will be able to actually make good on its promises to keep providing assistance to Ukraine. The biggest question on world leaders' minds is whether the U.S. The feedback from the group was a franker assessment than she had expected.” The interactions illustrated the limits of her patience with being asked for more and moving beyond what she felt she had already given. She listed free community college and ‘changing cancer as we know it’ before quickly switching back to a topic she was more comfortable with: her husband’s record on civil rights and education reform. “Another historian tried the same question in a different way: At the end of eight years, what would she most like to say she had done with the role? ‘I can’t really choose just one,’ she replied. ‘What is my goal?’ she repeated back, as if she had never pondered such a question. When one historian asked her what her overall goal was, she seemed puzzled. “t different moments throughout the meeting … the First Lady was either unable or unwilling to share the particulars of what she wanted to achieve, which of her predecessors she wanted to emulate, or what she wanted her legacy to be. JILL BIDEN’S SEARCH FOR MEANING - What does JILL BIDEN want her legacy to be? That question was at the center of a summit of scholars the first lady convened roughly a year into her time in the White House - one that turned out to be “a free-for-all from a group of historians whose feedback suggested that her interests were not expansive enough,” Katie Rogers writes in a buzzy Vanity Fair excerpt from “American Woman,” her much-anticipated new book on the evolution of the role of first lady. THAT’S … QUITE THE COMPARISON - Federalist Society cofounder STEVEN CALABRESI, writing for Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog: “The civil fraud judgment against DONALD TRUMP is a travesty and an unjust political act rivaled only in American politics by the killing of former Treasury Secretary ALEXANDER HAMILTON by Vice President AARON BURR.” (Calabresi has previously argued that Trump is ineligible to appear on 2024 ballots, then later changed his mind.) With help from Eli Okun, Garrett Ross and Bethany Irvine
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |